| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
|
Baltimore City Public School System |
05-H-CITY-61586 |
2/21/06 |
Parent/Guardian |
IEP Development/Review/
Revision, Nonpublic Placement |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The parent requested the student be placed in a nonpublic school which has a doctor on staff. The ALJ determined the parent did not meet the burden of proof and the request for nonpublic placement was denied. |
January 1, 2006 - March 31, 2006
In cases where MSDE has been informed that a hearing decision is being appealed in accordance with Section 615(i) of IDEA 2004, an asterisk (*) is placed next to the OAH Case #. The civil or district court number of the case is provided when available.
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
|
Baltimore City Public School System |
05-H-CITY-61587 |
2/17/06 |
Parent/Guardian |
IEP Development/Review/
Revision, Placement/LRE/
complainant requesting more
restrictive |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded the IEP and placement are appropriate to provide the student FAPE in LRE, therefore, denied the parent's request for placement in a more restrictive environment. |
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
|
Baltimore County Public Schools |
*05-H-BCNY-60161 |
2/21/06 |
Parent/Guardian |
Placement |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The parents requested reimbursement for placement in their preferred nonpublic school. The ALJ denied the parent's request and determined the nonpublic school recommended by BCPS was appropriate.
Appeal information: US District Court Case #06-CV-942 (RDB)
The Court remanded the case back to OAH,
and the ALJ reversed the decision
07-H-BCNY-24217 |
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
|
Montgomery County Public Schools |
05-H-MONT-45611* |
1/30/06 |
Parent/Guardian |
IEP Development/Review/
Revision, Nonpublic Placement/
Tuition Reimbursement |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded the IEP is appropriate to provide the student FAPE, therefore, denied the parent's request for nonpublic tuition reimbursement. |
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
|
Montgomery County Public Schools |
05-H-MONT-54986* |
1/24/2006 |
Parent/Guardian |
Compensatory Services, IEP Development/Review/
Revision, Nonpublic Placement/Tuition Reimbursement |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded the parents did not provide proper notice of their intent to enroll the student in a nonpublic placement at public expense, therefore, denied their request for tuition reimbursement. The ALJ also denied the parent's request for compensatory services for the time the student was without an IEP and placement, as the student voluntarily removed himself from school. The ALJ did order MCPS to develop an IEP with an appropriate placement for the student. |
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
|
Montgomery County Public Schools |
05-H-MONT-57887 |
1/26/06 |
Parent/Guardian |
IEP Development/Review/ Revision |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded the IEP is appropriate to provide the student FAPE. |
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
|
Montgomery County Public Schools |
05-H-MONT-58612 |
1/12/2006 |
Parent/Guardian |
Transportation |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The parent did not submit any evidence to support her claim that the student required door-to-door service, therefore, the matter was dismissed. |
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
|
Montgomery County Public Schools |
06-H-MONT-04409 |
2/28/2006 |
Parent/Guardian |
Not an IDEA Issue (school transfer) |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ granted MCPS' Motion for Summary Decision on the basis that no genuine dispute existed. Therefore, the case was dismissed. |
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
|
Prince George's County Public Schools |
05-H-PGEO-57108 |
2/7/2006 |
Parent/Guardian |
IEP Development/Review/
Revision, Placement/LRE/
complainant requesting more restrictive |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded the IEP and placement developed by PGCPS is appropriate to provide the student FAPE, therefore, the parents request was denied. |
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
|
Prince George's County Public Schools |
05-H-PGEO-60216 |
2/2/2006 |
Parent/Guardian |
IEP Content, IEP Implementation-accommodations, aids & services, modifications, IEP Implementation-speech/language services, Nonpublic Placement/Tuition Reimbursement |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded that the student did not receive speech language services in the IEP. However, PGCPS provided the student with compensatory services, therefore, that matter has been settled. The ALJ also found that the student did not receive the services of a one-to-one aide as required by the IEP, and ordered a remedy for that violation. The ALJ denied the parent's request for a nonpublic school stating that FAPE could be provided in a public school placement. |
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
|
Washington County Public Schools |
05-H-WASH-54651 |
3/2/2006 |
Parent/Guardian |
Disciplinary Procedures |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded the behavior which resulted in the student being placed in an alternative placement was not a manifestation of her disability, therefore, affirmed WCPS' determination. |
|
|
|
| Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services |
| Maryland State Department of Education |
| 200 West Baltimore Street |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|