(July 1, 2017 – September 30, 2017)
Due Process Hearing Decisions - Fiscal Year 2018
In cases where MSDE has been informed that a hearing decision is being appealed in accordance with Section 615(i) of IDEA 2004, an asterisk (*) is placed next to the OAH Case #. The civil or district court number of the case is provided when available.
|
Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
Anne Arundel
County Public Schools |
17-H-AARU-03664 |
7/14/2017 |
Parent/Guardian |
IEP Implementation-accommodations, aids & services, modifications, IEP Development/Review/Revision, Evaluation/Assessment, Reimbursement |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded that the IEPs developed for the student were reasonably calculated to provide the student with a FAPE. |
|
Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
Baltimore County Public Schools |
17-H-BCNY-18305 |
8/23/2017 |
Parent/Guardian |
IEP Implementatiom -Reimbursement |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded that the IEP developed for the student was reasonably calculated to provide the student with a FAPE. |
|
Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
Montgomery County Public Schools |
17-H-MONT-05289 |
7/12/2017 |
Parent/Guardian |
IEP Implementation-Placement, Nonpublic Placement/Tuition Reimbursement |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded that the IEP developed for the student was reasonably calculated to provide the student with a FAPE and, as a result, denied the parents’ request for reimbursement of the cost of tuition at a nonpublic school. |
|
Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
Montgomery County Public Schools |
17-H-MONT-16944 |
7/28/2017 |
Parent/Guardian |
IEP Implementation-Placement |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded that the IEP developed for the student was reasonably calculated to provide the student with a FAPE. |
|
Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
Montgomery County Public Schools |
17-H-MONT-14090 |
8/14/2017 |
Other |
IEP Implementation-Placement, Nonpublic Placement/Tuition Reimbursement |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded that the IEPs developed for the student were reasonably calculated to provide the student with a FAPE and, as a result, denied the parents’ request for reimbursement of the cost of tuition at a nonpublic school. |
|
Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
Montgomery County Public Schools |
17-H-MONT-14092 |
8/15/2017 |
Other |
IEP Implementation-Placement, Nonpublic Placement/Tuition Reimbursement |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded that the IEP and placement proposed by the local school system was reasonably calclated for the 2015-2016 school year and provided a FAPE in the least restrictive enironment. Therefore, the parents are not entitiled to reimbursement as a result of the their unilateral placement at a non public school for the 2015-2016 school year. |
|
Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
Montgomery County Public Schools |
17-H-MONT-24247 |
9/28/2017 |
Parent/Guardian |
IEP Implementation-Placement |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded that the IEP developed for the student was reasonably calculated to provide the student with a FAPE in the least restrictive environment (LRE). |
Contact InformationMaryland State Department of Education
Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services
200 West Baltimore Street Baltimore, MD 21201
Phone: 410-767-0238 Fax: 410-333-0664